☰ My Favourites
×

Register or Login to save your list

Can I reduce the risk level of my investments after 10 years?

Lucy | London| 02/08/2020 | 4

  • Stocks and Shares ISA

Lucy's question in full

Hello! I'm 22 years old and trying to navigate my finances. I have a comfortable safety buffer of £15,000, I'm contributing to my workplace pension and I'm also putting money into a cash LISA. I would now like to put £100 a month into a Stocks and Shares ISA. After exploring Boring Money, I've decided to opt for the Vanguard LifeStrategy 80% Equity Fund. I'm planning on investing this money for at least ten years. However, I wanted to know if there is any possibility of reducing risk after this time? For example, could I perhaps transfer to the 60% Equity Fund? Thanks for your help.

Holly Mackay's Response

Hi Lucy,

Firstly, congrats! I wish I had been as organised as you when I was 22.
You sound pretty organised and like you've ticked all the main boxes:

  • Decent cash buffer
  • Paying into a workplace pension, so getting the nice employer contributions
  • Some cash savings in a Lifetime ISA which I presume you intend to use for a property purchase

So it's now time to think about a Stocks and Shares ISA 

The Vanguard Lifestrategy funds are a very good option for newcomers to investing who aren't confident enough to pick their own funds and shares, and who want a big global brand to do the heavy lifting for them.

The benefit of setting up an ISA is that you are free to switch the funds inside this ISA, as and when you choose. So you are absolutely able to sell the 80% equity fund at a time to suit you, and switch the proceeds into a lower risk fund - perhaps nearer to the time when you think you will want to sell down your investments and take the cash.

This all sounds pretty sensible to me. 

I guess one question (and it is a question, because I don't know the answer) is that, if you think this money could be for more than a 10 year period, why are you not picking the 100% equity fund? 

So many people stick with the middle options because it feels intuitively safer then picking an extreme. It may be that you are fundamentally uncomfortable with the idea of owning 100% in shares, which is of course your prerogative. But you do have the cash buffers to mean that you should be able to weather any storms without needing to sell your investments when markets are going through tough times.

It could be that the 80% equity fund is the most sensible choice for you, but I'd just say have that internal dialogue and make sure you've got a logical reason for not investing these very long term savings fully in shares.

I hope that helps and good luck (not that it sounds like you need it!),

Holly

 

Just be aware...

We are not regulated to give personal financial advice - This isn’t full-fat regulated financial advice. Boring Money is a publisher and not regulated by the FCA. 

This means we can't help with specific personal circumstances or recommend specific investment products. It also basically means that if we say something daft, you have no recourse to come back and complain.

We’re only allowed to give you a steer or share an opinion or tell you the facts - That said, we promise that our answer to you is an independent unbiased perspective with no commercial gain to make. If you need regulated financial advice, you can find a good adviser via sites such as Unbiased & Vouchedfor.

Our Expert

Holly - 066.JPG

Holly Mackay

Founder and MD of Boring Money, Holly Mackay has been working in the investments space since 1998. She read Modern Languages at Oxford, with a special focus on Mediaeval French which was deeply interesting and arguably utterly useless.

Related Questions

Got a Question?

Got a question? Ask our experts

Ask Our Experts

Sign up for Holly's blog

Stay up to date

Our free weekly blog with Holly's
no-nonsense opinions, tips & food for thought.
If you change your mind, you can unsubscribe at any time. We'll never share your details and you can unsubscribe any time.