How have our investments performed? Tracking returns of ready-made investment solutions

top521.png

In January 2018 we set up test accounts with 15 platforms and robo advisers, investing £500 in ready-made ‘medium risk’ portfolios or own brand multi-asset funds. We selected portfolios which had closest to 60% in equities in Q1 2018.

 

Top observations after three years invested

  • Over a three year period the top performer –net of fees – has grown to £605, an increase of 21%

  • Moneyfarm, Vanguard and Nutmeg were the top performing portfolios net of charges

  • After fees, the average balance across all robo accounts in 2021 was £552 – an increase of 11% over a three-year period. For comparison, over the same period the FTSE 100 was down by 14%

  • If we consider medium risk portfolio returns over both a 12 month and 3 year period, Vanguard, Nutmeg and AJ Bell Youinvest have performed consistently well

 

Performance of medium-risk portfolios over a three-year period

Note: Fidelity and Barclays include a fixed fee element which impacts net performance on smaller accounts

 

Holly Mackay, our CEO, observes:

“As robo advisers experience continued growth, longer track records are shifting the focus from who has the snappiest app to a more fundamental performance decision.

“Over the past three years my £500 investment has made me £86 more with one provider than another. This sort of difference is material – and currently largely impossible to see if you are a retail customer shopping around for a ready-made solution.”

 

What’s in a name – medium risk portfolios have diverged over three years

Over three years, these medium risk portfolios have also diverged in asset allocations. The average % in shares of all providers in the medium risk bracket is 56% today. But in the portfolios, Moneyfarm’s equity allocation has shifted up to 79% and Wealthify’s has fallen to 43%.

If Boring Money had invested in Moneyfarm’s risk profile 5, for example, which is now closer to a 60% equity allocation, the notional balance after fees would have been £562.

 

Fixed fees impact smaller pots

A number of the providers have elements of fixed fees which make the charges disproportionately high for these small test accounts. Both Barclays and Fidelity have fixed fees or minimum monthly fees which disproportionately our smaller test accounts.

Boring Money modelled the same portfolios net of charges and based on a £50,000 portfolio, to illustrate the net position on these larger balances.

 

 

Passive portfolios with high US equity allocations have done best

When performance net of fees is looked at for larger £50,000 accounts, Santander, True Potential Investor and Hargreaves Lansdown performed the worst over a three-year period.

In addition to charges and equity allocations, the proportionate weighting to the US has been a key factor. The top three performers all had more than 40% of their overall share allocations in the US markets.

Holly concludes:

“This exercise shows the benefits of diversification offered by robo advisers. It’s also a reminder for investors to check what lies under the bonnet every so often, as the % in shares can change dramatically from one year to the next.

“After three years it’s also looking positive for the passive providers. The active portfolios we hold have not done better net of charges, even in such volatile markets.”

 

Full list of providers and funds

Platform

Fund

Asset Allocation

AJ Bell

VT AJ Bell Balanced I Acc

56.45%

Barclays

Barclays Wealth Gbl Mkts 3 R A

50.00%

Bestinvest

Tilney Growth Portfolio

67.12%

Charles Stanley

CS Multi Asset 3

47.00%

Fidelity

Multi Asset Allocator Growth Fund

56.11%

HL

Multi-manager Balanced

60.32%

IG

Balanced Portfolio

45.79%

Nutmeg

Portfolio 5 ESG

46.76%

Moneyfarm

Aggressive Portfolio 6/7

78.91%

Santander

Santander Multi-Index 3

58.77%

True Potential

Balanced Blended Portfolio

59.96%

Wealthify

Confident Portfolio

43.40%

Wealthsimple

Balanced Portfolio

50.00%

Vanguard

Vanguard LS 60

60.00%

Get updates every Friday

Sign up to Holly's Blog for weekly musings on money, great products, top tips and a dollop of opinion.

Sign up to Holly's Blog

How did they do last year?

Podium.png.jpg

How have robo advisers & investment platforms done with their ‘ready-made’ investment solutions for investors?

Trying to work out which investment providers have performed well after fees is no easy task. After much frustration and endless Excel spreadsheets, we decided that the easiest and least controversial way to measure who does well was simply to open an account, stick £500 in and see how they did. Here is our January 2020 independent guide for consumers.

Platform performance for ‘ready-made’ solutions

boring money chart jan19.png (1)

Who did best with £500? Best 2018-2019 online investment platforms and robo advisors revealed

How can you compare the performance of investment platforms when accounts and charges are all so different? We chucked £500 into over 20 different accounts to finally get you the answer.

Who did best with £500? Best online investment platforms and robo advisors revealed

Related Questions

Got a Question?

Sign up for Holly's blog

Stay up to date

Our free weekly blog with Holly's
no-nonsense opinions, tips & food for thought.
If you change your mind, you can unsubscribe at any time. We'll never share your details and you can unsubscribe any time.