How should I manage my money in drawdown?
What to know about asset allocation, income sequencing, and withdrawal strategies in retirement
Written by Holly Mackay
17 April, 2026
Managing money in drawdown means balancing the income you need today with keeping your investments growing for the long term. It offers flexible access to your pension, but also brings risks like market swings and the danger of running out of money. Getting the basics right: sustainable withdrawals, a sensible mix of assets, and whether to combine drawdown with an annuity, is essential for a secure retirement.

Drawdown is a way to manage your money in retirement. You retain 'skin in the game' by remaining largely invested in the stock market
, whilst periodically taking out some money to provide you with an income.It enables flexible access to retirement savings, but you do have to manage some key risks, including market volatility
and longevity (making sure the money doesn't run out).Important things to get clear are how to set up sustainable withdrawals, diversifying
amongst key asset classes such as bonds and shares, and also working out whether you use annuities as well as drawdown.Getting Going
I think there are 5 questions to ask yourself at the outset.
1. Retirement Expenses and Income
What will my annual living expenses be in retirement, including essentials like housing, healthcare, and travel?
How much do you currently spend a year? People can spend less in retirement but you may need about 70%–80% of your current income. Factor in inflation too – tricky to do today, but I'd assume around 3%. So you'll need to increase your annual assumptions just to keep up with the cost of living.
Add in a cash buffer for those unexpected financial hits.
And don't forget to factor in your State Pension – the full amount is around £11,500 each year from age 67. You can get a State Pension forecast here.
2. Income Sources
What income sources will you have in retirement?
This could include the State Pension, workplace pensions, drawdown, or part-time work. Don't forget any ISAs you may have saved.
3. Longevity Risk
How long do you think you might live for and will your plan cover 30 years or more of retirement if you need it to stretch?
Some platforms have calculators for things like pension value, compound interest
and life expectancy, e.g. Aviva and Hargreaves Lansdown.The average life expectancy in the UK today is 83 for women and 79 for men [1].
4. Risk Tolerance
How comfortable are you with the ups and downs of stock markets?
The general rule of thumb used to be a switch to about 40% in shares and 60% in bonds and cash in retirement. The younger you are, the more you should have in shares as these stand the best chance of growing. If you go too 'safe' too early, you risk your money running out.
In retirement, we should be focused less on risk to capital and more on risk to income. The two are connected but not the same. Moving to having more money in bonds may mean the value of our investment is less volatile but may also mean we don’t earn the returns we need to support our income all the way through retirement. How we invest should really centre on how much income we need and how much variability in income we can withstand.
While everyone is different, we’d generally look to a higher proportion in equities to generate growth and, importantly, to help protect against inflation in the long run. Also, investing in funds that are aiming to generate a higher level of income from their underlying assets may mean you can take income safely even when capital values fall.
We’ve also found that if you can be flexible about how much income you take, maybe reducing income when returns aren’t so good and increasing it when they are, you can get more income overall. People who need absolute certainty of income may need to think about combining annuities and investments to get that.
5. Legacy Goals
Do you want to leave an inheritance, and how does that affect choices like drawdown versus annuities?
Drawdown will preserve flexibility for heirs (who get this tax-free if you die before the age of 75), while annuities forfeit this but guarantee income.
On IHT changes from 2027 and the impact on legacy goals
Charles Riches, financial planner at Capital Partners, has been fielding anxious calls on this for months.
The change taking effect from 6th April 2027, bringing most unused pension funds into scope for Inheritance Tax, is genuinely one of the most significant shifts in retirement planning I have seen in a very long time. For years, retirees with substantial pension pots could use them as a highly efficient vehicle for passing wealth to the next generation — a pension sitting untouched at death could pass to beneficiaries entirely free of IHT, and free of income tax too if the holder died before age 75. That made the pension the natural 'last pot to touch' in retirement, something to preserve and grow as a legacy.
But from 2027, that logic is changing.
In conversations with clients over the past year, I have seen real anxiety about what this means for their wishes — people who had earmarked a pension fund worth hundreds of thousands of pounds as a gift for their children, only to realise that fund may now face a 40% IHT charge, and potentially income tax on top if they were over 75 at the time of death.
For many people who had saved up their pension as part of their retirement strategy to give away to loved ones, the new rules mean there’s now a real need for a change of strategy to ensure their inheritance is as tax-efficient as possible. (Don’t forget that transfers to spouses or civil partners will still remain exempt from the tax, though.)
The honest message is that the pension will shortly become a taxable estate asset like any other, and legacy planning has to be rebuilt around that reality. That means looking much more seriously at gifting strategies during lifetime — using ISA capital, making 'warm hand' gifts, or considering whether drawing down pension income earlier and gifting the surplus might actually be more tax-efficient than leaving a large fund untouched.
Beyond the question of legacy, these changes are also reshaping something more fundamental – the order in which retirees draw on their wealth. The classic approach for many clients — ISAs first, pensions last, was built on the assumption that the pension was the most IHT-efficient asset in the room. Remove that assumption, and the whole calculation changes entirely.
The questions Charles is currently fielding would not have happened even two years ago. Should clients start drawing their pension earlier than they need to, specifically to shrink the fund that will eventually sit in their taxable estate? Should they channel that income into regular gifts, using the 'normal expenditure out of income' exemption? And for those with larger estates, there’s a more subtle trap; pensions counted in the estate from 2027 could push some people above the £2 million residence nil-rate band taper threshold, costing up to £140,000 in additional IHT through the loss of that allowance alone.
The overall effect is that drawdown is no longer just about funding your own retirement — it has become a core tool in estate planning as well, and the two conversations, which advisers often had separately, now have to happen in the same room.
Drawdown Rules of Thumb
Once you've got a sense of your approach to these questions, it's time to start working out some sums.
4% Rule Baseline: The basic rule used to be that you could withdraw 4% of initial pot in year 1 (e.g., £40k on £1m), then inflate annually by inflation which could be assumed to be around 3%. If you have at least half of your money in shares, this should keep you going for around 30 years. Some question the 4% level, but it's not a bad starting point.
Cash Bucket: Consider keeping 2–5 years' spending (£50k–£150k average UK retiree) in cash equivalents (fixed-term savings, Premium Bonds if you like them, top rate cash accounts) for sequencing safety. This means you don't need to sell your shares to fund your income when markets are having a terrible time.
The 4% rule is a useful rule of thumb, but only in a very limited sense. It can help anchor expectations, particularly for those whose assumptions are shaped by the strong market returns of the past decade and who may believe that higher withdrawals are sustainable.
In reality, the rule was designed to reflect a balance between income and longevity under less favourable conditions, factoring in inflation and sequencing risk, where poor market returns early in retirement can permanently damage a portfolio even if long-term averages look reasonable. The 4% rule is not a personalised solution and should not be regarded as a target or guarantee.
Sustainable withdrawal rates are significantly influenced by timing, asset allocation, life expectancy, and the presence of other income sources. In practice, a robust cashflow model, regularly reviewed and adjusted, is far more valuable. The 4% rule is best seen as a starting point for discussion, not a strategy in its own right.
Managing Money in Drawdown
The first thing you need to work out is your asset allocation.
Asset Allocation
In pension drawdown, consider shifting to a more conservative asset allocation
as you enter retirement to protect your money while allowing growth.This depends on your age, health, and risk tolerance. Diversification across asset classes reduces sequencing risk – this is when poor early-retirement returns amplify losses when you sell and take money out when markets are low.
Income Sequencing
Income sequencing
addresses the risk of unfavourable market returns early in retirement, depleting your pot faster, known as sequencing risk. Mitigate it by using a lower initial withdrawal rate (e.g., 3–4% of pot value, adjusted for inflation) and drawing first from cash/bonds during downturns to let equities recover.Some people adopt what is known as variable sequencing – maybe 5% early (ages 60–70), tapering to 3% later. This matches higher active spending phases and preserves capital for longevity.
Don't forget your State Pension (around £11,500/year full rate from age 67+), any ISAs for tax-free income, and decent cash buffers to avoid selling low.
Manage the Early Years
Your first 5–10 years are important. The aim of the game is to keep your pot a decent size so it continues to grow. Consider holding a few years of expenses in low-risk cash or bonds to avoid selling equities during downturns and to give them a chance to recover.
In turmoil such as the recent war in Iran, consider adjusting your withdrawals dynamically – cut spending temporarily in bad markets (e.g., reduce by 10–20%) rather than sticking to fixed amounts that risk exhaustion.
Also sequence tax-efficiently. Consider drawing tax-free pension lump sums or ISAs first and delaying taxable income to fill your personal allowances (currently about £12,570 a year).
Work Out Your Buckets
Every year, it's worth having a look at these buckets and topping the short and medium term ones up from the long-term pot. It's important to have a cash buffer but you also don't want too much in cash too soon.
Don't Forget Tax
If you are a higher-rate taxpayer (40% band over £50,270 income), maximising the tax-free 25% pension lump sum (up to £268,275 Lump Sum Allowance) involves strategic timing, phasing, and reinvestment to avoid pushing taxable income higher or taxing growth prematurely. The goal is to preserve its tax-free status while using it efficiently in tax-sheltered vehicles.
Take in Phases
Withdraw the lump sum gradually over multiple tax years rather than all at once to stay within or near the basic-rate band (£12,571–£50,270), minimising tax on any linked drawdown income.
Consider crystallising portions of your pension pot annually (e.g., £50k tax-free each year), leaving the rest invested—providers like flexi-access drawdown allow this without triggering full taxation. This sequences tax-free cash to fill personal allowances or offset low-income years, avoiding the higher-rate trap on subsequent withdrawals.
Other Tax-Efficient Approaches
ISA Wrapper: Transfer directly to a Stocks & Shares ISA (up to £20k/year allowance) for tax-free growth and dividends—ideal for higher-rate taxpayers facing 40% income tax + 2.4% dividend tax otherwise. Prioritise this over general investments, as interest/dividends on non-sheltered accounts (e.g., savings) attract Personal Savings Allowance limits (£500 for higher-rate).
GIA or Premium Bonds: For short-term needs, consider using cash ISAs or NS&I Premium Bonds (tax-free prizes).
Avoid Pension Recycling: Don't recontribute to pensions (triggers anti-recycling rules: tax-free cash reduces annual allowance by amount recycled).
Drawdown vs Annuities
Don't Forget Annuities
Hybrid with partial annuity (20–30%) for essentials minimises sequencing risk.
Drawdown offers flexibility, investment growth potential, and inheritance (tax-efficient if death before 75, though IHT changes loom post-2027), but exposes you to market risk, depletion, and management effort.
Annuities provide guaranteed lifetime income (enhanced for age/health), shielding from volatility/inflation (via index-linked options) and simplicity, but lack flexibility, inheritance, and growth—plus poor rates lock in low income.
Choose drawdown if risk-tolerant with legacy goals; annuities for security-focused retirees with essentials coverage needs.
Both Drawdown and Annuities
A hybrid (blended) approach uses 30–50% of pot for an annuity covering essentials (bills/food), with the rest in drawdown for lifestyle/flexibility and growth. This balance guarantees against sequencing risk with upside potential and inheritance. Ideal for moderate risk profiles.
When it comes to retirement planning, people need to consider what they expect their retirement to look like, based on their individual circumstances, and work out how best to make the most of their retirement savings. What’s becoming more appealing is the idea of a blended approach, with annuities and drawdown working in combination to meet different needs in retirement. This approach allows a portion of savings left in flexible drawdown and with the potential to grow, and the annuitised portion providing an element of guarantee to cover essential costs in retirement.
Since the Iran war started, according to Legal & General. Income from a £100,000 level annuity has risen by around £100 to £6,300 a year (based on a 65-year-old man with a 50 per cent spouse’s pension). Over the past five years, the rises have been stark. In early 2021, comparative rates were just £3,800 a year, so annuities have certainly become more interesting for consumers planning for retirement.
____
[1] ONS
Post a comment:
This is an open discussion and does not represent the views of Boring Money. We want our communities to be welcoming and helpful. Spam, personal attacks and offensive language will not be tolerated. Posts may be deleted and repeat offenders blocked at our discretion.



